Aquí cito de un artículo sobre Pepi, Luci. Favor de responder a la hipotesis expuesta aquí y argumentar en favor o en contra. Recuerda que se debe incluir en tu respuesta al menos un aspecto visual/filmico y no solamente argumental (del “plot”)
Louise Davis, for example, suggests that although Almodovar produces feminist films, he continues to perpetuate patriarchal stereotypes about women and female sexuality rather than liberating women. Davis argues that the image of femininity is prevalent and recurrent in Almodovar’s films, even if his female characters share many similarities with traditional and stereotypical images of women. According to Davis, Almodovar’s woman takes numerous forms, such as the sexually perverse lesbian or bi-sexual, the neurotic, and the non-woman, all of whom are subjected to the dominating power of men who constantly prove their male superiority (Davis, 186-8). In terms of gendered queerness in Almodovar’s cinema, Davis argues, lesbianism is defined as it is viewed by men, whereas the postmodern, pluralistic, non absolutist world is for men only, as the result of Almodovar’s homosexual male utopia, in which gay men succeed and prosper and all woman are inferior and perverse (ibid, 89-91).